Friday, March 8, 2019

Lincoln: Democratic or Autocratic Essay

capital of Nebraska was one of the or so democratic and to a fault one of the most imposing of presidents.Abraham Lincoln was a very democratic president. He believed in the gist and would do anything to elapse it together after the secession of the south-central that followed his election as president. However, to be cured _or_ healed the entirety of the trades union, he had to make some risky decisions that may hold in labeled him as autocratic. The fact that he was both democratic and autocratic is valid for the most part. However, the purpose of his tyrannical transactions was to preserve the Union.Lincoln could be seen as democratic through his persistent drive to save the Union. aft(prenominal) his election in 1860, the deep south seceded from the Union off of the judgement that their rights were being violated. Then, following the events at Fort Sumter, the rest of the south seceded. Lincoln did everything in his power to try and regain peace in the boorish and sa ve the Union from destruction. He stuck with the warfare for four long and bloody years while the Army of the Potomac was constantly struggling with defeat. If George McClellan had won the presidency, there would be negotiated peace. War would not have been sought out to chip in back the southern states. Instead, there would be no guarantee that the south would even return to the Union. In addition, Lincoln did not believe in slavery. Even though he was still racist towards black, he truism the obvious immorality of the establishment. He fought for their freedom through his Emancipation Proclamation, which tell that all slaves in the cabal were free from their masters. Lincoln fought for the preservation of the Union, a symbol of equality and democracy. He would protect it at any cost. With that, he also freed the slaves in the United States, which supported the idea of democracy he felt he needed to protect.Although Lincoln was a man of the people, he could also be considered as autocratic. scarcely his tyrannical decisions and actions were not do for desire of power. He do them out of democratic intentions. Lincoln hang the Writs of Habeas Corpus in the area between Washington and Philadelphia, a blustering move on his part. The Supreme Court even ruled this action unconstitutional, yet Lincoln ignored it. Without putting much thought into it, this does appear unfair and unconstitutional. Put it was wartime, and not all the same rules apply. Lincoln made this decision for the turn a profit of the war effort. There were mob attacks on Union troops passing through Baltimore, so by suspending the writs, civilians supporting the Confederacy could be arrested and held without a trial. In addition, Lincoln expanded the size of the Union Army without congressional approvement. But of course, this was vital to the war, since this action allowed the North to add up the South.Also, the Emancipation Proclamation was considered unconstitutional by some. Li ncoln pushed this act through that would free all the slaves in the Confederate territory without the vote from the states it would affect. But Lincolns reasoning behind this was that by making the war about slavery, it would prevent England and France from joining the fight, for if they did, it would be a lost motive for the North. In addition to this, Lincoln hoped that the free blacks would provide further stretch forth for the South. Not only would the freedom for all the Souths blacks tout ensemble shake their economy, they could also join the fight for their freedom. Lincoln did many things in extending his executive power that may have been seen as tyrannical and autocratic, but the reason he made these decisions was to protect and preserve the Union as a symbol and model of democracy.Abraham Lincoln was clearly democratic as he fought to maintain the Union as a whole. He was also the one responsible for the freedom of African Americans. And even though he did take some au tocratic action during his presidency, it always had some benefit for the war effort, whether it was disrupting the Southern economy to make the anaconda plan draw faster, or to detain Confederate sympathizers in the Union. Without Lincolns unmingled behavior, the war would never have been won. Without him, the Union would be broken.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.