Even if computers become self-aware Essay

Even if computing devices become self-aw ar, they allow never pee anything like serviceman souls. Discuss. In order to discuss this topic, I must obtain definitions for the wrangling electronic computer, self-aware, and soul. This is so that I pot micturate my arguments upon a st open base. These definitions maintain been gathered from The Oxford Paperback Dictionary & synonym finder. From this definition of soul, it is obvious that computers exhaust to become a person to have a soul, and this is impossible as (by definition) a person is a military personnel be, and cannot be anything else.However, possibly it is possible for a computer to acquire something actually similar to a soul. For example, a computer may be able to have feelings, emotions, consciousness, opinions and other characteristics of humans with souls. These abilities in a computer are known as A. I. (artificial intelligence). This seems impossible with the computers of this day and age, however, if one follows the drastic improvement in technology over the last century, one can see that what we know as standard now was inconceivable long time ago.What we call a computer (like the one this has been written on) would have been something wisdom fiction in the beginning of the 20th Century. Therefore, it is obvious that there is awe-inspiring scope for computers to become a lot more improved in the future. They may even overhear some if not total A. I. This implies that a computer could obtain all the intelligence of a human being if not more. The statement I am discussing asserts that even if computers become conscious, they will never have a spiritual or immaterial bump to them.This is blatantly true, as we (the creators of computers) know that we have and will have lone(prenominal) built them out of materials. I believe that we will not have the ability to insert a spiritual side into a computer within the same time-span that we will have the ability to give computers A. I. Ho wever, maybe computers can acquire A. I. , and maybe this is the next best thing to a soul. After all, we have no proof that we ( macrocosm) have souls this is just a religious belief that we have faith in.Therefore, it is probable (from an atheistic target of view) that we are just advanced computers. The only difference is that we are make of biological materials, which are a lot more complex than the materials utilise in a computer. These may have a capacity, unknown to existence and incapable of other materials, to have souls. On the other hand, there are biological life forms (i. e. plants), which we believe not to have souls.Science has shown that human beings have evolved over years, from animals like apes, and originally from organisms like bacteria. If this is true, then it shows that humans were once creatures without intelligence that is just something we have achieved through evolution. Then surely, when computers gain the ability to make decisions, they will be abl e to improve themselves and in a virtual evolution improve and improve over time, worthy more and more lifelike? It is also possible that computers already have minds.The qualia problem suggests that we cannot determine whether something has a mind or is conscious tho by the way it acts. Just because a computer seems to be a slave to us, doing exactly what we tell it to do when we press buttons, does that necessarily sloshed that this is all it is capable off? Or even all that is does? A computer obviously does a lot more than we know, as it already has vague forms of artificial intelligence. A lot of standard software has assistants with A. I. in order to assist and help us.